06142406 JUNGWOOJUNG
Should be Amazon developed?
Amazon rainforest is one of the best natural resources in the world. Here is lung of earth why Oxyzen recycle carbon dioxide. It makes 20% of Oxyzen in the world.
Amazon river starts from Andes mountain range in Peru to east area in Brazil. The width of Amazon river is 1mile. It flows to Atlantic ocean. There are many animals
such as 500 mammals and 175 lizards and 300 other reptiles. One third of birds live in Amazon. And many natives lived approximately 10 millions Indians 500 years ago. After 1900 year, over 90 tribes was destroyed. so natives under 2 hundred thousand remain these day.
Selvasu is the place in the most dense forest. This place supplies many oxyzen to earth. and have been many natural resources.
So Brazil as the most indebted one of countries makes a plan to improve national economy throughout the development of this region.
But America, Japan, Europe opposite the development of Selvasu. Because if Brazil cut trees of dense forest and construct the city or farm or pasture, Oxyzen of the world will gradually reduce. Oppositionists of developed countries mention the environment problem is not the problem of specific country but it is the problem of the world. Brazilian government admit the preservation of the environment but don't want to give up the industry and a development policy to lag behind developed countries.
I think if Amazon is developed we can get a big advantage for our economy. But we should think our future. We just come to the earth for a while but it's not ours. We should give our young generation to this place. So we have to preserve Amazon.
I also think that they should preserve Amazon not just for people in the world but also for themselves. They have the best natural resources. That's very attractive. They could earn money by using that. As time goes on, our nature was being destroyed by people in the world. We developed our land by building facilities, schools, apartments, etc. We put hundreds of moeny to make our land develped, but at the same time we put our money to see wonderful nature. It looks like a contradiction, but that's what is happening nowadays. Again, they could earn money by using the awesome nature. They could attract many tourists. They should look the land in broader perspective. Other countries, especially advanced countries get many benefits from this nature, so they should pay for those.
답글삭제